Chapter 2
detailed summary tables of results

 2.1 List of integrals sorted by grade for each CAS
  2.1.1 Rubi
  2.1.2 Mathematica
  2.1.3 Maple
  2.1.4 Maxima
  2.1.5 FriCAS
  2.1.6 Sympy
  2.1.7 Giac
 2.2 Detailed conclusion table per each integral for all CAS systems
 2.3 Detailed conclusion table specific for Rubi results

2.1 List of integrals sorted by grade for each CAS

2.1.1 Rubi

A grade: { 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27 }

B grade: { }

C grade: { }

F grade: { }

2.1.2 Mathematica

A grade: { 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 22, 25, 26, 27 }

B grade: { 12, 20, 21, 23, 24 }

C grade: { }

F grade: { }

2.1.3 Maple

A grade: { 1, 2, 3, 4 }

B grade: { 5, 6, 7, 8, 16, 17, 18, 25, 26, 27 }

C grade: { }

F grade: { 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24 }

2.1.4 Maxima

A grade: { 4, 16, 17, 18

B grade: { 1, 2, 3 }

C grade: { 25, 26, 27 }

F grade: { 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24 }

2.1.5 FriCAS

A grade: { 5, 17, 18 }

B grade: { 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 16, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24 }

C grade: { 25, 26, 27 }

F grade: { 8, 9, 15 }

2.1.6 Sympy

A grade: { }

B grade: { }

C grade: { }

F grade: { 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27 }

2.1.7 Giac

A grade: { 3, 4, 5, 6 }

B grade: { 1, 2, 7, 8, 16, 17, 18 }

C grade: { 25, 26, 27 }

F grade: { 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24 }

2.2 Detailed conclusion table per each integral for all CAS systems

Detailed conclusion table per each integral is given by table below. The elapsed time is in seconds. For failed result it is given as F(-1) if the failure was due to timeout. It is given as F(-2) if the failure was due to an exception being raised, which could indicate a bug in the system. If the failure was due to integral not being evaluated within the time limit, then it is given just an F.

In this table,the column normalized size is defined as \(\frac{\text{antiderivative leaf size}}{\text{optimal antiderivative leaf size}}\)










Problem 1 Optimal Rubi Mathematica Maple Maxima Fricas Sympy Giac









grade A A A A B B F B
verified N/A Yes Yes TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
size 114 114 149 129 953 2356 0 451
normalized size 1 1. 1.31 1.13 8.36 20.67 0. 3.96
time (sec) N/A 0.074 3.36 0.033 1.031 1.581 0. 1.201


















Problem 2 Optimal Rubi Mathematica Maple Maxima Fricas Sympy Giac









grade A A A A B B F B
verified N/A Yes Yes TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
size 74 74 113 83 451 1134 0 246
normalized size 1 1. 1.53 1.12 6.09 15.32 0. 3.32
time (sec) N/A 0.048 3.52 0.023 1.012 1.616 0. 1.192


















Problem 3 Optimal Rubi Mathematica Maple Maxima Fricas Sympy Giac









grade A A A A B B F A
verified N/A Yes Yes TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
size 43 43 84 47 163 429 0 109
normalized size 1 1. 1.95 1.09 3.79 9.98 0. 2.53
time (sec) N/A 0.032 0.612 0.023 1.008 1.708 0. 1.241


















Problem 4 Optimal Rubi Mathematica Maple Maxima Fricas Sympy Giac









grade A A A A A B F A
verified N/A Yes Yes TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
size 16 16 16 17 31 89 0 31
normalized size 1 1. 1. 1.06 1.94 5.56 0. 1.94
time (sec) N/A 0.014 0.017 0.005 0.982 1.597 0. 1.165


















Problem 5 Optimal Rubi Mathematica Maple Maxima Fricas Sympy Giac









grade A A A B F(-2) A F A
verified N/A Yes Yes TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
size 50 50 52 302 0 1122 0 88
normalized size 1 1. 1.04 6.04 0. 22.44 0. 1.76
time (sec) N/A 0.055 0.197 0.07 0. 1.797 0. 1.188


















Problem 6 Optimal Rubi Mathematica Maple Maxima Fricas Sympy Giac









grade A A A B F(-2) B F A
verified N/A Yes Yes TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
size 100 100 199 778 0 4199 0 228
normalized size 1 1. 1.99 7.78 0. 41.99 0. 2.28
time (sec) N/A 0.127 0.681 0.059 0. 1.919 0. 1.335


















Problem 7 Optimal Rubi Mathematica Maple Maxima Fricas Sympy Giac









grade A A A B F(-2) B F B
verified N/A Yes Yes TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
size 156 156 210 1798 0 15505 0 450
normalized size 1 1. 1.35 11.53 0. 99.39 0. 2.88
time (sec) N/A 0.216 1.534 0.069 0. 2.503 0. 1.27


















Problem 8 Optimal Rubi Mathematica Maple Maxima Fricas Sympy Giac









grade A A A B F(-2) F(-1) F B
verified N/A Yes Yes TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
size 220 220 273 3638 0 0 0 814
normalized size 1 1. 1.24 16.54 0. 0. 0. 3.7
time (sec) N/A 0.344 3.666 0.079 0. 0. 0. 1.336


















Problem 9 Optimal Rubi Mathematica Maple Maxima Fricas Sympy Giac









grade A A A F F F(-1) F F
verified N/A Yes Yes TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
size 174 174 231 0 0 0 0 0
normalized size 1 1. 1.33 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.
time (sec) N/A 0.188 4.889 0.187 0. 0. 0. 0.


















Problem 10 Optimal Rubi Mathematica Maple Maxima Fricas Sympy Giac









grade A A A F F B F F(-2)
verified N/A Yes Yes TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
size 126 126 193 0 0 17550 0 0
normalized size 1 1. 1.53 0. 0. 139.29 0. 0.
time (sec) N/A 0.11 0.827 0.147 0. 4.683 0. 0.


















Problem 11 Optimal Rubi Mathematica Maple Maxima Fricas Sympy Giac









grade A A A F F B F F(-2)
verified N/A Yes Yes TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
size 84 84 143 0 0 11634 0 0
normalized size 1 1. 1.7 0. 0. 138.5 0. 0.
time (sec) N/A 0.055 0.214 0.184 0. 2.94 0. 0.


















Problem 12 Optimal Rubi Mathematica Maple Maxima Fricas Sympy Giac









grade A A B F F B F F
verified N/A Yes Yes TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
size 38 41 97 0 0 4286 0 0
normalized size 1 1.08 2.55 0. 0. 112.79 0. 0.
time (sec) N/A 0.038 0.142 0.233 0. 2.237 0. 0.


















Problem 13 Optimal Rubi Mathematica Maple Maxima Fricas Sympy Giac









grade A A A F F B F F
verified N/A Yes Yes TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
size 82 82 148 0 0 7602 0 0
normalized size 1 1. 1.8 0. 0. 92.71 0. 0.
time (sec) N/A 0.056 0.339 0.141 0. 3.087 0. 0.


















Problem 14 Optimal Rubi Mathematica Maple Maxima Fricas Sympy Giac









grade A A A F F B F F
verified N/A Yes Yes TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
size 135 135 174 0 0 18590 0 0
normalized size 1 1. 1.29 0. 0. 137.7 0. 0.
time (sec) N/A 0.109 1.646 0.14 0. 6.757 0. 0.


















Problem 15 Optimal Rubi Mathematica Maple Maxima Fricas Sympy Giac









grade A A A F F F(-1) F F
verified N/A Yes Yes TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
size 193 193 234 0 0 0 0 0
normalized size 1 1. 1.21 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.
time (sec) N/A 0.192 1.412 0.14 0. 0. 0. 0.


















Problem 16 Optimal Rubi Mathematica Maple Maxima Fricas Sympy Giac









grade A A A B A B F B
verified N/A Yes Yes TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
size 29 29 24 120 59 620 0 99
normalized size 1 1. 0.83 4.14 2.03 21.38 0. 3.41
time (sec) N/A 0.038 0.016 0.107 1.726 2.183 0. 1.191


















Problem 17 Optimal Rubi Mathematica Maple Maxima Fricas Sympy Giac









grade A A A B A A F B
verified N/A Yes Yes TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
size 14 14 14 79 30 55 0 36
normalized size 1 1. 1. 5.64 2.14 3.93 0. 2.57
time (sec) N/A 0.02 0.006 0.118 1.554 2.14 0. 1.174


















Problem 18 Optimal Rubi Mathematica Maple Maxima Fricas Sympy Giac









grade A A A B A A F B
verified N/A Yes Yes TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
size 14 14 14 79 18 55 0 41
normalized size 1 1. 1. 5.64 1.29 3.93 0. 2.93
time (sec) N/A 0.024 0.01 0.114 1.495 2.1 0. 1.145


















Problem 19 Optimal Rubi Mathematica Maple Maxima Fricas Sympy Giac









grade A A A F F B F F
verified N/A Yes Yes TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
size 46 46 92 0 0 1843 0 0
normalized size 1 1. 2. 0. 0. 40.07 0. 0.
time (sec) N/A 0.047 0.207 0.094 0. 2.198 0. 0.


















Problem 20 Optimal Rubi Mathematica Maple Maxima Fricas Sympy Giac









grade A A B F F B F F
verified N/A Yes Yes TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
size 26 26 65 0 0 786 0 0
normalized size 1 1. 2.5 0. 0. 30.23 0. 0.
time (sec) N/A 0.024 0.064 0.112 0. 2.22 0. 0.


















Problem 21 Optimal Rubi Mathematica Maple Maxima Fricas Sympy Giac









grade A A B F F B F F
verified N/A Yes Yes TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
size 16 16 45 0 0 571 0 0
normalized size 1 1. 2.81 0. 0. 35.69 0. 0.
time (sec) N/A 0.02 0.051 0.145 0. 2.108 0. 0.


















Problem 22 Optimal Rubi Mathematica Maple Maxima Fricas Sympy Giac









grade A A A F F B F F
verified N/A Yes Yes TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
size 47 47 90 0 0 2329 0 0
normalized size 1 1. 1.91 0. 0. 49.55 0. 0.
time (sec) N/A 0.043 0.095 0.089 0. 2.266 0. 0.


















Problem 23 Optimal Rubi Mathematica Maple Maxima Fricas Sympy Giac









grade A A B F F B F F
verified N/A Yes Yes TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
size 33 33 68 0 0 1273 0 0
normalized size 1 1. 2.06 0. 0. 38.58 0. 0.
time (sec) N/A 0.024 0.038 0.115 0. 2.252 0. 0.


















Problem 24 Optimal Rubi Mathematica Maple Maxima Fricas Sympy Giac









grade A A B F F B F F
verified N/A Yes Yes TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
size 14 14 48 0 0 756 0 0
normalized size 1 1. 3.43 0. 0. 54. 0. 0.
time (sec) N/A 0.018 0.03 0.14 0. 2.209 0. 0.


















Problem 25 Optimal Rubi Mathematica Maple Maxima Fricas Sympy Giac









grade A A A B C C F C
verified N/A Yes Yes TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
size 34 34 26 123 59 165 0 113
normalized size 1 1. 0.76 3.62 1.74 4.85 0. 3.32
time (sec) N/A 0.037 0.016 0.098 1.516 2.116 0. 1.162


















Problem 26 Optimal Rubi Mathematica Maple Maxima Fricas Sympy Giac









grade A A A B C C F C
verified N/A Yes Yes TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
size 16 16 16 81 30 36 0 43
normalized size 1 1. 1. 5.06 1.88 2.25 0. 2.69
time (sec) N/A 0.02 0.005 0.118 1.53 2.061 0. 1.151


















Problem 27 Optimal Rubi Mathematica Maple Maxima Fricas Sympy Giac









grade A A A B C C F C
verified N/A Yes Yes TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
size 16 16 16 81 18 35 0 50
normalized size 1 1. 1. 5.06 1.12 2.19 0. 3.12
time (sec) N/A 0.023 0.008 0.116 1.551 2.068 0. 1.233









2.3 Detailed conclusion table specific for Rubi results

The following table is specific to Rubi. It gives additional statistics for each integral. the column steps is the number of steps used by Rubi to obtain the antiderivative. The rules column is the number of unique rules used. The integrand size column is the leaf size of the integrand. Finally the ratio \(\frac{\text{number of rules}}{\text{integrand size}}\) is given. The larger this ratio is, the harder the integral was to solve. In this test, problem number [22] had the largest ratio of [ 0.7 ]

Table 2.1Rubi specific breakdown of results for each integral














# grade
number of
steps
used
number of
unique
rules
normalized
antiderivative
leaf size
integrand
leaf size
\(\frac{\text{number of rules}}{\text{integrand leaf size}}\)







1 A 4 3 1. 14 0.214







2 A 4 3 1. 14 0.214







3 A 4 3 1. 14 0.214







4 A 3 2 1. 12 0.167







5 A 3 3 1. 14 0.214







6 A 5 5 1. 14 0.357







7 A 6 6 1. 14 0.429







8 A 7 6 1. 14 0.429







9 A 8 7 1. 16 0.438







10 A 7 6 1. 16 0.375







11 A 6 5 1. 16 0.312







12 A 3 3 1.08 16 0.188







13 A 4 4 1. 16 0.25







14 A 6 6 1. 16 0.375







15 A 7 6 1. 16 0.375







16 A 4 4 1. 10 0.4







17 A 3 3 1. 10 0.3







18 A 3 3 1. 10 0.3







19 A 6 6 1. 12 0.5







20 A 5 5 1. 12 0.417







21 A 3 3 1. 12 0.25







22 A 7 7 1. 10 0.7







23 A 6 6 1. 10 0.6







24 A 3 3 1. 10 0.3







25 A 4 4 1. 12 0.333







26 A 3 3 1. 12 0.25







27 A 3 3 1. 12 0.25